How to Change the Oligomeric State of a Circular Protein Assembly: Switch from 11-Subunit to 12-Subunit TRAP Suggests a General Mechanism

Multisubunit circular proteins play key roles in a variety of biological mechanisms. A number of proteins including bacterial toxins [1], viral portal proteins [2], flagellar motor proteins [3], [4], Sm-like proteins [5], components of the type III secretion system [6] and protective antigen of anthrax toxin [7], [8] can form circular oligomers with alternative oligomeric states. In some cases, for example for the viral portal proteins, a single functional oligomeric state is found in vivo and it is not known if the alternative oligomeric states are active.

Introduction

Multisubunit circular proteins play key roles in a variety of biological mechanisms. A number of proteins including bacterial toxins [1], viral portal proteins [2], flagellar motor proteins [3], [4], Sm-like proteins [5], components of the type III secretion system [6] and protective antigen of anthrax toxin [7], [8] can form circular oligomers with alternative oligomeric states. In some cases, for example for the viral portal proteins, a single functional oligomeric state is found in vivo and it is not known if the alternative oligomeric states are active. However, in all cases changing the number of constituents in the ring will alter the symmetry, the internal cavity diameter and curvature of the protein ring, these changes may be critical to the function. Here we examined the factors that define the oligomeric state in a circular protein oligomer by studying the Bacillus trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (TRAP).

TRAP regulates transcription and translation of tryptophan biosynthetic genes in many Bacilli, including Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus licheniformisand Bacillus halodurans [9], [10]. Studies on B. subtilis have shown that when TRAP is activated by bound tryptophan, it can recognize and bind specific segments of RNA [11], [12]. When the tryptophan concentration is high transcription attenuation occurs as TRAP, binding to the leader RNA region of the trpEDCFBA operon transcript, induces the formation of a transcription terminator hairpin thus preventing the establishment of an antiterminator structure. When the concentration of tryptophan is limiting, TRAP is inactive, which allows transcription to proceed into the structural genes [13].

Previously determined X-ray structures of B. subtilis and B. stearothermophilus TRAP [14], [15]revealed 11-subunit oligomers with essentially identical architecture. In most Bacillus species the trp leader segment that interacts with TRAP contains 11 NAG triplets (N is predominantly G or U) separated by two or three spacer nucleotides [15]. The X-ray structure of B. stearothermophilus TRAP in complex with RNA showed how the 11 triplets of RNA are matched by 11 binding sites generated at the outer surface of the 11-subunit TRAP [16]. Unlike most other Bacillus species, the RNA leader region in the alkaliphilic bacterium B. haloduranscontains 19 NAG triplets, which could potentially interact with TRAP. The oligomeric state of B. halodurans TRAP was unknown and we speculated that it might contain more than eleven subunits.

B. halodurans grows at pH values above 9.5 and contains a 76 amino acid TRAP protein [17]that shares ∼71% sequence identity with B. subtilis TRAP, Figure 1A. Like B. subtilis TRAP, B. halodurans TRAP has a high affinity towards the trp leader RNA [10]. We characterized B. halodurans TRAP by native mass spectrometry and determined its crystal structure at 1.7 Å resolution. We show that unlike the 11-subunit TRAP found in B. subtilis and B. stearothermophilus, B. halodurans TRAP is a 12-subunit oligomer, implying that this larger oligomeric state has some functional benefit. The most significant difference between the structures is a conformation change at the C-terminus. This change alters the interface interactions and we hypothesized that these changes were responsible for the change in oligomeric state. We tested this hypothesis by creating mutant B. subtilis and B. stearothermophilus TRAP proteins in which the last five amino acids were removed. X-ray structures of these engineered TRAP, reported here at a high resolution, together with the native mass spectrometry data, show that as predicted, these truncated proteins exist as 12-subunit assemblies. Notably, with the exception of the C-terminus, the 11-mer to 12-mer transition is not accompanied by any significant conformational changes within individual subunits. The 12-mer state is generated from the 11-mer state by a simple rigid-body rotation of individual subunits around inter-subunit axes, triggered by the amino acid deletion at one side of the axis. Each axis crosses a central part of the subunit-subunit interface and is roughly parallel to the tunnel axis. We tested if the 11-mer to 12-mer transition could be also induced by an addition at the opposite, inner side of the axis. We mutated Val11 to Leu in B.subtilis TRAP and obtained native mass spectrometry data, showing that this mutation also results in 11-mer to 12-mer transition. We argue that similar approach could be used for engineering a transition between different states of other circular proteins.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Structure of B. halodurans TRAP. See image here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025296.g001

(A) Sequence alignment of TRAP proteins from different species produced by ClustalW [18]. The extent of sequence conservation is depicted in grey with identical residues in black and non-conserved in white. Residues important for the conformation of the C-terminus are highlighted by red stars and residues that interact with RNA are highlighted by yellow stars. (B) Ribbon diagrams viewed along the 12-fold axis (two opposite views). Each subunit is shown in a different color. The C-terminus of each subunit, starting from residue 71, is shown by a thick yellow ribbon. L-Tryptophan molecules, bound in deep pockets between adjacent subunits, are shown as van der Waals models with carboxyl oxygen atoms in red, nitrogen atoms in blue and carbon atoms in yellow.

Results

Crystal structure of B. halodurans TRAP

B. halodurans TRAP (PDB accession code 3ZZL) forms a circular assembly containing 12-subunits, Figure 1B. The 12-mer in the crystal is generated by combination of three subunits (present in the asymmetric unit) with the crystallographic 4-fold axis of the P4212 space group. The structure was refined with data extending to 1.67 Å, Table 1. The final electron density maps allowed the positioning of all residues, except the six N-terminal residues of all subunits. The diameter of the central tunnel, measured for the Cα positions of Ser7, is 30.7 Å, an increase from 26.6 Å observed in the B. stearothermophilus TRAP. Like the 11-mer TRAP molecule, the 12-mer assembly of B. halodurans TRAP is stabilized by an identical pattern of main chain – main chain hydrogen bonding interactions, Table S1. These interactions link a three-stranded β-sheet from one subunit with a four-stranded β-sheet from the adjacent subunit resulting in the formation of twelve seven-stranded inter-subunit β-sheets per oligomer.

thumbnail

Table 1. Data collection and refinement statistics. See image here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025296.t001

Both 11-subunit and 12-subunit TRAP assemblies exist in nature

The crystallographic and mass spectrometry data reported here show that B. halodurans TRAP exists as 12-subunit oligomer, Figure 1B and Table 2. Thus, both the eleven and twelve subunit assemblies have been selected by different species to perform the same function. It is possible that the increase to 12 subunits is favored by the apparent redundancy in triplet repeats in B. halodurans [10]. In spite of the difference in the number of subunits and the angular separation between individual subunits, the affinity of the B. halodurans TRAP 12-mer towards the trp leader RNA is essentially the same as for B. subtilis TRAP 11-mer, with the Kdbeing ∼4 nM in each case [10]. The similar affinities are generated because of conservation of the RNA-binding residues leading to similar binding motifs, Figure 1A, and by comparable distances between adjacent NAG-binding pockets on the protein’s surface, Table 3.

thumbnail

Table 2. Summary of native mass spectrometry analysis. See table here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025296.t002

thumbnail

Table 3. Average distance (Å) between Cα atoms of RNA-binding residues belonging to adjacent subunits. See table here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025296.t003

Rotation of subunits during the 11-mer to 12-mer switch

The main chain r.m.s. difference between residues 8–70 of B. stearothermophilus TRAP 11-mer (wild type) and B. halodurans TRAP 12-mer is 0.48 Å, indicating that the 11-mer to 12-mer transition is not accompanied by significant conformational changes in the protein. The transition is achieved largely by the 2.7° rigid-body rotation of individual subunits around inter-subunit axes. These axes, relating rotational adjustments between adjacent subunits, Figures 2A and 3, are roughly parallel to the tunnel axis. Each axis crosses a central part of the subunit-subunit interface thus minimizing structural changes at the interfaces during the rotation. The 2.7° rigid-body rotation of individual subunits is accompanied by much smaller positional adjustments in individual residues easily accommodated by the plasticity in the protein’s structure. These adjustments serve to maintain the interface and its individual contacts while allowing the overall rotation of subunits with respect to each other. As a result, there are only subtle changes in subunit-subunit interactions. For example, the lengths of the inter-subunit main chain hydrogen bonds that link β-strands belonging to adjacent subunits are very similar in the 12-mer and 11-mer TRAP proteins, Table S1, although the differences increase with greater distance from the inter-subunit axis.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Comparison of 11-mer and 12-mer TRAP assemblies. See images here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025296.g002

(A) Dimers of B. halodurans TRAP (red and yellow) and wild-type B. stearothermophilusTRAP (both subunits in blue) were least-square fitted using main chain atoms of single subunit (shown on the right). Cα-models are shown with the segment 72–75 highlighted by wide traces. View is from outside the TRAP ring toward its center with the central rotation axis vertical. The inter-subunit rotational axis relating the 11-mer and 12-mer oligomers is shown by dashed line. (B, C, and D) Comparison of the C-terminus conformation in 11-mer and 12-mer TRAP. C-terminal residues starting from 71 and residues stabilizing the conformation of the C-terminus are shown by sticks, the rest of the subunit interface is shown by ribbons.

thumbnail

Figure 3. 11-mer to 12-mer transition. See image here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025296.g003

Individual TRAP subunits are shown as ball-and-stick models in different shades of grey. Inter-subunit rotation axes are roughly parallel to the central oligomer axis and are depicted by black crosses shown in yellow circles. (A) Removal of the C-terminal segment (green) at one side of the axis or (B) introduction of methylene group through Val-11-Leu mutation (blue) at the other side of the axis, allows subunits to roll around the inter-subunit rotation axis to form a 12-mer.

Role of C-terminal residues in selecting between different oligomeric states

The 2.7° rotation of neighboring subunits with respect to each other is possible owing to a significant change in the conformation of the five C-terminal amino acids in B. haloduransTRAP. In both B. subtilis and B. stearothermophilus TRAP, Ser72 and Glu73 are positioned at the subunit-subunit interface, Figures 2B, C. Ser72 is part of a β-strand, making two main chain – main chain hydrogen bonding interactions with Ala61 from the adjacent β-strand of the same subunit. Glu73 also has the β-strand conformation but its main-chain atoms are exposed towards the adjacent subunit resulting in an inter-subunit main chain hydrogen bonding interaction formed by its nitrogen atom with the carbonyl oxygen of Gly41. In B. haloduransTRAP Thr72 and Glu73 have different conformations being displaced from the interface towards the outer surface of the molecule, Figure 2D. This results in the rupture of the main chain – main chain hydrogen bond between the conserved residues, Gly41 and Glu73. The different conformation of the C-terminal residues is stabilized by a new set of salt bridges formed by the pairs of residues Glu73/Lys15 and Glu76/Lys13, Figure 2D. Stabilizing intersubunit hydrogen bonding interactions are also formed by the side chain of Lys13 with main chain carbonyls of Asp71 and Lys74. In addition, most interfaces (8 out of 12) contain a salt bridge between Asp75 and Lys40. The displacement of the C-terminal residues from the subunit-subunit interface observed in B. halodurans TRAP hinted at the possibility that the C-terminus plays a key role in selecting between the 11-mer and 12-mer assemblies.

Design of 12-mer TRAP by deletion or addition at subunit interface

We hypothesized that the 11-mer to 12-mer switch could be induced by withdrawal of the C-terminal amino acids from the subunit-subunit interface, as observed in B. halodurans TRAP. Such a switch could be engineered by simply removing the C-terminal amino acids starting from position 72. We tested this idea using B. stearothermophilus TRAP which normally forms 11-mers. The E71stop B. stearothermophilus TRAP mutant protein was truncated after residue 71 thus removing the five C-terminal amino acids and the main chain hydrogen bond between Gly41 and Glu73. The crystal structure of E71stop TRAP (PDB accession code 3ZZS), refined with data extending to 1.49 Å, Table 1, shows that this engineered protein indeed forms 12-mers, Figure S1. Likewise, removing the last four amino acids from the C-terminus of B. subtilisTRAP, which is shorter by one amino acid compared to the B. stearothermophilus TRAP (Figure 1A), also generated a 12-subunit oligomer, Figure S1. The structure of this mutant B. subtilis TRAP (PDB accession code 3ZZQ) was refined with data extending to 1.75 Å, Table 1.

Both B. subtilis and B. stearothermophilus engineered 12-mer TRAP molecules have overall architectures almost identical to that of the B. halodurans 12-mer TRAP, Figure S1. The conformation of individual subunits is also very similar, with the main chain r.m.s. difference with the B. halodrurans TRAP (residues 8–65) of 0.38 Å and 0.33 Å, respectively, for the engineered B. stearothermophilus and B. subtilis TRAP. The engineered 12-mer TRAP share almost identical intersubunit hydrogen bonding patterns with those in wild type 11-mers, Tables S2and S3. All TRAP molecules analyzed have 5 equivalent main-chain hydrogen bonding pairs generated between the two β-strands belonging to adjacent subunits, Table S1. All 12-mer TRAP proteins bind tryptophan molecules in essentially identical manner as 11-mer TRAP, Text S1 and Figure S2.

We hypothesized that the rotational adjustment of subunits, similar to that generated by deletion at the outer side of the intersubunit axis, Figure 3A, could be also achieved by addition at its inner side, as shown on Figure 3B. We tested this hypothesis by introducing a slightly bulkier leucine residue in place of valine (V11L mutation) in B. subtilis TRAP. Although we were not able to crystallize this mutant TRAP, the mass spectrometry data presented in the next section clearly demonstrate that unlike the wild type 11-mer, this mutant TRAP also forms 12-mers, as predicted.

Native mass spectrometry of TRAP

Previous analysis of B. subtilis TRAP by native mass spectrometry showed that its preferred oligomeric state is an 11-mer [19], [20] as found in the crystal structure [14]. We questioned whether the 12-subunit assemblies of B. halodurans TRAP and B. stearothermophilus E71stop TRAP predominate in solution or whether these were selected from a mixture of different oligomeric states during crystallization. For B. halodurans TRAP, the single stable species identified from mass spectra is the 12-mer, Figure 4A and Table 2. In addition, 12-mers with different number of bound L-tryptophan molecules were observed with maximum of 12 tryptophans per oligomer. For the B. stearothermophilus E71stop TRAP, again only one stable species was detected during the mass-spectrometry experiments, which corresponded to the 12-mer assembly. For this mutant TRAP, states with different number of bound tryptophan molecules were resolved in the presence of 1 µM L-tryptophan, Figure 4B. In the case of the B. subtilis V11L TRAP, the single 12-mer specie has been detected during the experiment, although for this mutant it was not possible to resolve states corresponding to different number of bound tryptophan molecules, Figure 4C. Control spectra obtained for B. stearothermophilusTRAP correspond to the 11-subunit oligomer, Table 2.

thumbnail

Figure 4. Native mass spectrometry analysis. See image here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025296.g004

 Nanoflow electrospray mass spectra for (A) B. halodurans TRAP, (B) B. stearothermophilus E71stop TRAP and (C) B. subtilis V11L TRAP. A stable 12-mer species was identified in each sample; peaks corresponding to different charge states and different numbers of bound tryptophan molecules are labeled.

Discussion

Structural reorganization during the transition between different oligomeric states

Several proteins found in nature can form alternative circular assemblies. Sm and Sm-like proteins involved in nucleic acid processing were found as hexamers, heptamers and octamers [21], [22]. Two states corresponding to a hexamer and heptamer were resolved for the AAA+ domain of the NtrC-like transcriptional regulators [23], [24]. Bacteriophage SPP1 portal protein was found as a 12-mer assembly in mature capsids but forms non-functional 13-subunit assemblies when over expressed [2]. In this report we show that B. halodurans TRAP forms 12-subunit assemblies, unlike the B. subtilis and B. stearothermophilus TRAP that form 11-subunit oligomers. If like in TRAP, the functional interactions are at the surface and do not involve the central tunnel, it is clear that the same function can be accomplished by different oligomeric states. These structures also suggest that the oligomeric state could be manipulated so that the protein’s properties are optimized for the required function.

There are only few cases where accurate structural information is available on alternative circular oligomers formed by chemically identical subunits. In addition to TRAP, X-ray structures of alternative states are available for the SAP-like pentraxin from Limulus polyphemus [25], for the protective antigen protein of Bacillus anthracis [7], [8] and for the small terminase from bacteriophage SF6 [Bűttner et al., to be published]. The SAP-like pentraxin exists as a natural mixture of 7-subunit and 8-subunit oligomers. Likewise, the SF6 small terminase appears to exist as a mixture of 9-subunit and 10-subunit oligomeric forms. In the case of the protective antigen however, the transition between 7-mer and 8-mer oligomers is controlled by the loop of residues 305–324 located at the outer side of the inter-subunit rotation axis, removal of this loop stabilizes the 8-mer state [8]. For all four proteins, the transition from one oligomeric state to another is achieved by a simple rotation of adjacent subunits around inter-subunit axes, as seen in TRAP. On the basis of these structural observations we propose a general mechanism for transition between different oligomeric states of a multisubunit circular protein, Figure 5, which involves rigid-body rotation around inter-subunit axes. These overall rotations are accompanied by minor conformational adjustments at subunit-subunit interfaces facilitated by proteins’ plasticity. Notably, comparison of the alternative oligomeric states of all four proteins shows that the transition from an n-subunit to (n+1)-subunit state roughly doubles the seemingly obvious (n+1)/n increase in the diameter of the central tunnel, Table 4. This is because each inter-subunit rotation axis is positioned in the center of the subunit-subunit interface and not at its inner edge. This arrangement minimizes structural changes at the interfaces.

thumbnail

 

Figure 5. General model for transition between alternative oligomeric states. See image here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025296.g005

Transition from n-subunit to (n+1)-subunit state could be accomplished either by deletion (green triangles) at the outer side of the inter-subunit rotation axis (A) or insertion (light blue triangles) at the inner side of the axis (B). Inserts with three-dimensional representation show two adjacent subunits of each oligomer, with the intersubunit axis relating rotation of adjacent subunits during transition between the two states shown in yellow.

Table 4. Increase in the size of the central tunnel.

C-terminus defines the oligomerization state of TRAP

Comparison of the B. halodurans TRAP structure with the available structures of TRAP 11-mers indicated that the C-terminal segment consisting of residues 71–75 plays a critical role in selecting between 11-mer and 12-mer TRAP. The conformational change in the C-terminal residues of B. halodurans TRAP occurs owing to Asp71 forming a salt bridge with the side chain of Lys15, pulling the C-terminal residues 72–76 out of the subunit-subunit interface, Figure 2D; there is no such interaction in the 11-mer TRAP proteins since Lys15 is substituted by either Leu15 in B. stearothermophilus TRAP or Val15 in B. subtilis TRAP. Thr72 of B. halodurans TRAP also contributes to the diversion of the main chain. The carbonyl group of the corresponding residue, Ser72, in both B. subtilis and B. stearothermophilus TRAP form a hydrogen bond with the main chain of Ala61, fixing the position of the C-terminus next to the β-strands of neighboring subunit, Figures 2B and C. Such an interaction is prohibited in B. halodurans TRAP owing to steric hindrance caused by the methyl group of Thr72, thus facilitating the twisting of the main chain, Figure 2D. Sequence alignments show that, like B. halodurans TRAP, the TRAP proteins of Paenibacillus sp. and Bacillus clausii also have Lys at position 15 and Thr at position 72, Figure 1A. It is likely that these TRAP proteins could also exist as 12-mer assemblies.

It appears that the variation in oligomer number is a consequence of the evolutionary process. TRAP molecules that contain eleven subunits may represent a more evolved, minimized resource efficient version of a common ancestor. Alternatively, while the strength of the interaction between the RNA leader region and different TRAP molecules has been shown to be essentially identical, the potential influence of the oligomeric state on the interaction with other cellular factors cannot be excluded.

Artificial 12-mer TRAP molecules have been previously constructed by linking multiple B. stearothermophilus TRAP monomers into one continuous polypeptide chain [26]. Linking the C- and N-termini of three or four adjacent subunits with three-residue poly-alanine linkers resulted in 12-mers (called TRAP3 in the case of a three-subunit polypeptide). It was argued that entropy plays a major role in selecting the oligomeric state of TRAP, choosing a minimum number of separate polypeptide chains – 11 in the case of wild type TRAP and 4 in the case of TRAP3 [26]. However, structural comparisons and inspection of the electron density maps shows significant differences in conformation of C-terminal residues in the artificial 12-mer. In this molecule residue 72 is displaced from the subunit interface towards the oligomer’s surface and there is no interpretable electron density for residue 73 suggesting it is flexible or has significant conformational variability. The altered conformation of the C-terminus in the artificial TRAP3 protein is apparently caused by the three-residue peptide linker (that links individual polypeptides) being simply too short to maintain the native configuration of the C-terminus. The conformational change in the artificial TRAP thus appears to parallel the behavior in the B. halodurans TRAP 12-mer, creating space at one side of the rotation axis and allowing a rotational adjustment between adjacent subunits. Consequently the true reason for the formation of the artificial TRAP3 12-mer assembly is the conformational difference in the C-terminus induced by addition of the polypeptide linkers. This is not to say however that entropic effects do not contribute to the stability of protein assembly.

How to change the oligomeric state of a circular assembly?

To conclude, structural data on alternative oligomeric states of TRAP and other circular proteins show how essentially identical subunits could assembly into different oligomeric states. The similarity in their structural behavior is striking: the conformation of individual subunits in different oligomeric states remains largely unchanged with the exception of short segments that modulate inter-subunit surfaces. The transition is achieved by a simple rigid body rotation of adjacent subunits.

Structural information on B.halodurans TRAP suggested how such a transition could be induced by additions or deletions at inter-subunit surfaces. We tested this hypothesis by introducing mutations in 11-subunit TRAP, showing that residue deletion at the outer side of the inter-subunit axis or addition at the inner side, Figure 4, resulted in transition from an 11-subunit to 12-subunit state. This approach thus offers a promising route for controlling and alternating the subunit number of a circular protein and the size of its central tunnel, Figure 5. For some protein molecules, which use the central tunnel for their mechanism, change in the tunnel’s diameter will obviously have functional implications.

Materials and Methods

Gene cloning, protein purification, crystallization and data collection

The engineered B. subtilis and B. stearothermophilus TRAP including point mutations and truncations were generated using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene, US) and a pET9a plasmid containing the wild type gene. All TRAP proteins were produced and purified as described previously [10]. Before crystallization, protein samples were transferred into solution containing 20 mM Tris (pH 8.5), 300 mM NaCl and purified by size-exclusion chromatography using Superdex 200 Column (GE healthcare, UK).

Crystallization was carried out at 18°C using hanging drop vapor diffusion. For crystallization, B. halodurans TRAP was transferred into solution containing 10 mM triethanolamine (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 15 mM L-tryptophan and concentrated to 30 mg/ml. The reservoir contained 100 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 20 mM MgCl2 and 16% polyacrylic acid 5100 (v/v). B. stearothermophilusE71stop TRAP was crystallized using 50 mg/ml protein solution in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.5), 300 mM NaCl and 5 mM L-tryptophan. The reservoir contained 100 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 200 mM MgCl2 and 30% iso-propanol (v/v). For crystallization, B. subtilis TRAP K71stop was transferred into solution containing 20 mM triethanolamine (pH 8.5), 100 mM NaCl and 15 mM L-tryptophan and concentrated to 26 mg/ml. The reservoir contained 100 mM Bis-Tris-Propane (pH 8.5), 0.2 M Na/K tartrate and 10% PEG 3350 (v/v). Protein crystals were frozen using solutions containing all the crystallization ingredients with addition of 20% glycerol (v/v). The X-ray data were collected at 120 K using synchrotron radiation. In the case of B. haloduransTRAP the data were collected at the Diamond Light Source station I24. For B. stearothermophilus E71stop TRAP and B. subtilis K71stop TRAP, the data were collected at the ESRF station ID14-2 and station ID14-4, respectively. Data were processed using HKL2000 [27], Table 1.

Structure determination and refinement

All crystallographic calculations were carried out using the CCP4 program package [28]. The structures were solved by molecular replacement using MOLREP [29] with three adjacent subunits of B. stearothermophilus TRAP as a search model. Refinement was performed by REFMAC [30] and model rebuilding was done using COOT [31]. Water molecules were added automatically with the program ARP/wARP [32] and further corrected using maximum likelihood-weighted 2|Fo| – |Fc| and |Fo| – |Fc| electron density maps. Molecular contacts between adjacent monomers of TRAP were examined by CONTACT [28]. All figures were generated using CCP4mg [33].

Native Mass spectrometry

All protein samples were in solution containing 100 mM ammonium acetate (pH 7.5) and 10 µM L-tryptophan at a concentration of 0.1–0.4 mg/ml. Mass spectrometry was performed using an orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight LCT premier XE system (Waters, MA, US), equipped with an offline nanoflow emitter (New Objective, MA, US). Mass spectra were acquired over the range 2000 to 8000 m/z, integrated over 5 sec intervals. Masslynx 4.1 software (Waters, MA, US) was employed to analyze the results. Molecular masses and standard deviations were calculated from the centroid values of species with at least three charge states. The data were calibrated externally with CsI solution (10 mg/ml). Measured masses (Table 2) are somewhat greater than calculated, as observed earlier for other systems [34].

References

  1. Tilley SJ, Orlova EV, Gilbert RJC, Andrew PW, Saibil HR (2005) Structural basis of pore formation by the bacterial toxin pneumolysin. Cell 121: 247–256.SJ TilleyEV OrlovaRJC GilbertPW AndrewHR Saibil2005Structural basis of pore formation by the bacterial toxin pneumolysin.Cell121247256
  2. Lebedev A, Krause MH, Isidro AL, Vagin A, Orlova EV, et al. (2007) Structural framework for DNA translocation via the viral portal protein. EMBO J 26: 1984–1994.A. LebedevMH KrauseAL IsidroA. VaginEV Orlova2007Structural framework for DNA translocation via the viral portal protein.EMBO J2619841994
  3. Young HS, Dang H, Lai Y, DeRosier DJ, Khan S (2003) Variable symmetry in Salmonella typhimurium flagellar motors. Biophys J 84: 571–577.HS YoungH. DangY. LaiDJ DeRosierS. Khan2003Variable symmetry in Salmonella typhimurium flagellar motors.Biophys J84571577
  4. Minamino T, Imada K, Namba K (2008) Molecular motors of the bacterial flagella. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18: 693–701.T. MinaminoK. ImadaK. Namba2008Molecular motors of the bacterial flagella.Curr Opin Struct Biol18693701
  5. Thaurn S (2008) Roles of eukaryotic Lsm proteins in the regulation of mRNA function. Inter Rev Cell Mol Biol 272: 149–189.S. Thaurn2008Roles of eukaryotic Lsm proteins in the regulation of mRNA function.Inter Rev Cell Mol Biol272149189
  6. Moraes TF, Spreter T, Strynadka NCJ (2008) Piecing together the type III injectisome of bacterial pathogens. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18: 258–266.TF MoraesT. SpreterNCJ Strynadka2008Piecing together the type III injectisome of bacterial pathogens.Curr Opin Struct Biol18258266
  7. Lacy DB, Wigelsworth DJ, Melnyk RA, Harrison SC, Collier RJ (2004) Structure of heptameric protective antigen bound to an anthrax toxin receptor: a role for receptor in pH-dependent pore formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 13147–13151.DB LacyDJ WigelsworthRA MelnykSC HarrisonRJ Collier2004Structure of heptameric protective antigen bound to an anthrax toxin receptor: a role for receptor in pH-dependent pore formation.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1011314713151
  8. Kintzer AF, Thoren KL, Sterling HJ, Dong KC, Feld GK, et al. (2009) The protective antigen component of anthrax toxin forms functional octameric complexes. J Mol Biol 329: 614–629.AF KintzerKL ThorenHJ SterlingKC DongGK Feld2009The protective antigen component of anthrax toxin forms functional octameric complexes.J Mol Biol329614629
  9. Gollnick P, Babitzke P, Antson A, Yanofsky C (2005) Complexity in regulation of tryptophan biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis. Annu Rev Genet 39: 47–68.P. GollnickP. BabitzkeA. AntsonC. Yanofsky2005Complexity in regulation of tryptophan biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis.Annu Rev Genet394768
  10. Szigeti R, Milescu M, Gollnick P (2004) Regulation of the tryptophan biosynthetic genes in Bacillus halodurans: common elements but different strategies than those used by Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 186: 818–828.R. SzigetiM. MilescuP. Gollnick2004Regulation of the tryptophan biosynthetic genes in Bacillus halodurans: common elements but different strategies than those used by Bacillus subtilis.J Bacteriol186818828
  11. Babitzke P, Gollnick P, Yanofsky C (1992) The mtrAB operon of Bacillus subtilisencodes GTP cyclohydrolase I (MtrA), an enzyme involved in folic acid biosynthesis, and MtrB, a regulator of tryptophan biosynthesis. J Bacteriol 174: 2059–2064.P. BabitzkeP. GollnickC. Yanofsky1992The mtrAB operon of Bacillus subtilis encodes GTP cyclohydrolase I (MtrA), an enzyme involved in folic acid biosynthesis, and MtrB, a regulator of tryptophan biosynthesis.J Bacteriol17420592064
  12. Babitzke P, Yanofsky C (1993) Reconstitution of Bacillus subtilis trp attenuation in vitrowith TRAP, the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein. P Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 133–137.P. BabitzkeC. Yanofsky1993Reconstitution of Bacillus subtilis trp attenuation in vitrowith TRAP, the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein.P Natl Acad Sci USA90133137
  13. Otridge J, Gollnick P (1993) MtrB from Bacillus subtilis binds specifically to trp leader RNA in a tryptophan-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 128–132.J. OtridgeP. Gollnick1993MtrB from Bacillus subtilis binds specifically to trp leader RNA in a tryptophan-dependent manner.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A90128132
  14. Antson AA, Otridge J, Brzozowski AM, Dodson EJ, Dodson GG, et al. (1995) The structure of trp RNA-binding attenuation protein. Nature 374: 693–700.AA AntsonJ. OtridgeAM BrzozowskiEJ DodsonGG Dodson1995The structure of trp RNA-binding attenuation protein.Nature374693700
  15. Chen X, Antson AA, Yang M, Li P, Baumann C, et al. (1999) Regulatory features of the trpoperon and the crystal structure of the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein from Bacillus stearothermophilus. J Mol Biol 289: 1003–1016.X. ChenAA AntsonM. YangP. LiC. Baumann1999Regulatory features of the trpoperon and the crystal structure of the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein from Bacillus stearothermophilus.J Mol Biol28910031016
  16. Antson AA, Dodson EJ, Dodson GG, Greaves RB, Chen X-P, et al. (1999) Structure of the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein, TRAP, bound to RNA. Nature 401: 235–242.AA AntsonEJ DodsonGG DodsonRB GreavesX-P Chen1999Structure of the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein, TRAP, bound to RNA.Nature401235242
  17. Takami H, Nakasone K, Takaki Y, Maeno G, Sasaki R, et al. (2000) Complete genome sequence of the alkaliphilic bacterium Bacillus halodurans and genomic sequence comparison with Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Research 28: 4317–4331.H. TakamiK. NakasoneY. TakakiG. MaenoR. Sasaki2000Complete genome sequence of the alkaliphilic bacterium Bacillus halodurans and genomic sequence comparison with Bacillus subtilis.Nucleic Acids Research2843174331
  18. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) Clustal-W – Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673–4680.JD ThompsonDG HigginsTJ Gibson1994Clustal-W – Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.Nucleic Acids Research2246734680
  19. McCammon MG, Hernandez H, Sobott F, Robinson CV (2004) Tandem mass spectrometry defines the stoichiometry and quaternary structural arrangement of tryptophan molecules in the multiprotein complex TRAP. J Am Chem Soc 126: 5950–5951.MG McCammonH. HernandezF. SobottCV Robinson2004Tandem mass spectrometry defines the stoichiometry and quaternary structural arrangement of tryptophan molecules in the multiprotein complex TRAP.J Am Chem Soc12659505951
  20. Ruotolo RT, Giles K, Campuzano I, Sandercock AM, Bateman RH, et al. (2005) Evidence for macromolecular protein rings in the absence of bulk water. Science 310: 1658–1661.RT RuotoloK. GilesI. CampuzanoAM SandercockRH Bateman2005Evidence for macromolecular protein rings in the absence of bulk water.Science31016581661
  21. Toro I, Basquin J, Teo-Derher H, Suck D (2002) Archaeal Sm protein form heptameric and hexameric complexes: crystal structures of the Sm1 and Sm2 proteins from the hyperthermophile archaeoglobus fulgidus. J Mol Biol 320: 129–142.I. ToroJ. BasquinH. Teo-DerherD. Suck2002Archaeal Sm protein form heptameric and hexameric complexes: crystal structures of the Sm1 and Sm2 proteins from the hyperthermophile archaeoglobus fulgidus.J Mol Biol320129142
  22. Naidoo N, Harrop SJ, Sobti M, Haynes PA, Szmczyna BR, et al. (2008) Crystal structure of Lsm3 octamer from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications for Lsm ring organisation and recruitment. J Mol Biol 377: 1357–1371.N. NaidooSJ HarropM. SobtiPA HaynesBR Szmczyna2008Crystal structure of Lsm3 octamer from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications for Lsm ring organisation and recruitment.J Mol Biol37713571371
  23. Lee SY, De La Torre A, Yan D, Kustu S, Nixon BT, et al. (2003) Regulation of the transcriptional activator NtrC1: structural studies of the regulatory and AAA+ ATPase domains. Genes Dev 17: 2552–2563.SY LeeA. De La TorreD. YanS. KustuBT Nixon2003Regulation of the transcriptional activator NtrC1: structural studies of the regulatory and AAA+ ATPase domains.Genes Dev1725522563
  24. Sallai L, Tucker PA (2005) Crystal structure of the centraland C-terminal domain of the σ54-activator ZraR. J Stru Biol 151: 160–170.L. SallaiPA Tucker2005Crystal structure of the centraland C-terminal domain of the σ54-activator ZraR.J Stru Biol151160170
  25. Shrive AK, Burn I, Chou HT, Stahlberg H, Armstrong PB, et al. (2009) Crystal structures of Limulus SAP-like pentraxin reveal two molecular aggreations. J Mol Biol 386: 1240–1254.AK ShriveI. BurnHT ChouH. StahlbergPB Armstrong2009Crystal structures of Limulus SAP-like pentraxin reveal two molecular aggreations.J Mol Biol38612401254
  26. Heddle JG, Yokoyama T, Yamashita I, Park SY, Tame JRH (2006) Rounding up: Engineering 12-membered rings from the cyclic 11-mer TRAP. Structure 14: 925–933.JG HeddleT. YokoyamaI. YamashitaSY ParkJRH Tame2006Rounding up: Engineering 12-membered rings from the cyclic 11-mer TRAP.Structure14925933
  27. Otwinowski Z, Minor W (1997) Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Macromolecular Crystallography, Pt A 276: 307–326.Z. OtwinowskiW. Minor1997Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode.Macromolecular Crystallography, Pt A276307326
  28. The Collaborative Computational Project 4 (1994) The CCP4 Suite – Programs for Protein Crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D 50: 760–763.The Collaborative Computational Project 41994The CCP4 Suite – Programs for Protein Crystallography.Acta Crystallogr D50760763
  29. Vagin A, Teplyakov A (2000) An approach to multi-copy search in molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr D 56: 1622–1624.A. VaginA. Teplyakov2000An approach to multi-copy search in molecular replacement.Acta Crystallogr D5616221624
  30. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Lebedev A, Wilson KS, Dodson EJ (1999) Efficient anisotropic refinement of macromolecular structures using FFT. Acta Crystallogr D 55: 247–255.GN MurshudovAA VaginA. LebedevKS WilsonEJ Dodson1999Efficient anisotropic refinement of macromolecular structures using FFT.Acta Crystallogr D55247255
  31. Emsley P, Cowtan K (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D 60: 2126–2132.P. EmsleyK. Cowtan2004Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics.Acta Crystallogr D6021262132
  32. Lamzin VS, Wilson KS (1993) Automated Refinement of Protein Models. Acta Crystallogr D 49: 129–147.VS LamzinKS Wilson1993Automated Refinement of Protein Models.Acta Crystallogr D49129147
  33. Potterton L, McNicholas S, Krissinel E, Gruber J, Cowtan K, et al. (2004) Developments in the CCP4 molecular-graphics project. Acta Crystallogr D 60: 2288–2294.L. PottertonS. McNicholasE. KrissinelJ. GruberK. Cowtan2004Developments in the CCP4 molecular-graphics project.Acta Crystallogr D6022882294
  34. Green BN, Gotoh T, Suzuki T, Zal F, Lallier FH, et al. (2001) Observation of large, non-covalent globin subassemblies in the ∼3600 kDa hexagonal bilayer hemoglobins by electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Mol Biol 309: 553–560.BN GreenT. GotohT. SuzukiF. ZalFH Lallier2001Observation of large, non-covalent globin subassemblies in the ∼3600 kDa hexagonal bilayer hemoglobins by electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.J Mol Biol309553560

Leave a Reply

How to Change the Oligomeric State of a Circular Protein Assembly: Switch from 11-Subunit to 12-Subunit TRAP Suggests a General Mechanism

Multisubunit circular proteins play key roles in a variety of biological mechanisms. A number of proteins including bacterial toxins [1], viral portal proteins [2], flagellar motor proteins [3], [4], Sm-like proteins [5], components of the type III secretion system [6] and protective antigen of anthrax toxin [7], [8] can form circular oligomers with alternative oligomeric states. In some cases, for example for the viral portal proteins, a single functional oligomeric state is found in vivo and it is not known if the alternative oligomeric states are active.

Scroll to top